On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 09:32:50PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2020-07-15 21:02:43 [+0200], Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > > > <snip> > > spin_lock(); > > __get_free_page(GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN); > > spin_unlock(); > > <snip> > > > > Also, please note we do it for regular kernel. > > ach right okay then. > > > > > > > What happened to the part where I asked for a spinlock_t? > > > > > What do you mean? > > Please drop that raw_spinlock_t for the kfree_rcu() based locking and > use just a plain spinlock_t for the locking. Then you can keep the same > code flow for RT and !RT without any special cases and everything. > Ahhh... That i see :) I guess it is up to Paul. I wrote my thoughts. I have only one concern that i explained in my previous mails. Thank you, Sebastian, for your comments! -- Vlad Rezki
