On Thu 09-07-20 11:53:07, Yafang Shao wrote: > Recently we found an issue on our production environment that when memcg > oom is triggered the oom killer doesn't chose the process with largest > resident memory but chose the first scanned process. Note that all > processes in this memcg have the same oom_score_adj, so the oom killer > should chose the process with largest resident memory. > > Bellow is part of the oom info, which is enough to analyze this issue. > [7516987.983223] memory: usage 16777216kB, limit 16777216kB, failcnt 52843037 > [7516987.983224] memory+swap: usage 16777216kB, limit 9007199254740988kB, failcnt 0 > [7516987.983225] kmem: usage 301464kB, limit 9007199254740988kB, failcnt 0 > [...] > [7516987.983293] [ pid ] uid tgid total_vm rss pgtables_bytes swapents oom_score_adj name > [7516987.983510] [ 5740] 0 5740 257 1 32768 0 -998 pause > [7516987.983574] [58804] 0 58804 4594 771 81920 0 -998 entry_point.bas > [7516987.983577] [58908] 0 58908 7089 689 98304 0 -998 cron > [7516987.983580] [58910] 0 58910 16235 5576 163840 0 -998 supervisord > [7516987.983590] [59620] 0 59620 18074 1395 188416 0 -998 sshd > [7516987.983594] [59622] 0 59622 18680 6679 188416 0 -998 python > [7516987.983598] [59624] 0 59624 1859266 5161 548864 0 -998 odin-agent > [7516987.983600] [59625] 0 59625 707223 9248 983040 0 -998 filebeat > [7516987.983604] [59627] 0 59627 416433 64239 774144 0 -998 odin-log-agent > [7516987.983607] [59631] 0 59631 180671 15012 385024 0 -998 python3 > [7516987.983612] [61396] 0 61396 791287 3189 352256 0 -998 client > [7516987.983615] [61641] 0 61641 1844642 29089 946176 0 -998 client > [7516987.983765] [ 9236] 0 9236 2642 467 53248 0 -998 php_scanner > [7516987.983911] [42898] 0 42898 15543 838 167936 0 -998 su > [7516987.983915] [42900] 1000 42900 3673 867 77824 0 -998 exec_script_vr2 > [7516987.983918] [42925] 1000 42925 36475 19033 335872 0 -998 python > [7516987.983921] [57146] 1000 57146 3673 848 73728 0 -998 exec_script_J2p > [7516987.983925] [57195] 1000 57195 186359 22958 491520 0 -998 python2 > [7516987.983928] [58376] 1000 58376 275764 14402 290816 0 -998 rosmaster > [7516987.983931] [58395] 1000 58395 155166 4449 245760 0 -998 rosout > [7516987.983935] [58406] 1000 58406 18285584 3967322 37101568 0 -998 data_sim > [7516987.984221] oom-kill:constraint=CONSTRAINT_MEMCG,nodemask=(null),cpuset=3aa16c9482ae3a6f6b78bda68a55d32c87c99b985e0f11331cddf05af6c4d753,mems_allowed=0-1,oom_memcg=/kubepods/podf1c273d3-9b36-11ea-b3df-246e9693c184,task_memcg=/kubepods/podf1c273d3-9b36-11ea-b3df-246e9693c184/1f246a3eeea8f70bf91141eeaf1805346a666e225f823906485ea0b6c37dfc3d,task=pause,pid=5740,uid=0 > [7516987.984254] Memory cgroup out of memory: Killed process 5740 (pause) total-vm:1028kB, anon-rss:4kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB > [7516988.092344] oom_reaper: reaped process 5740 (pause), now anon-rss:0kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB > > We can find that the first scanned process 5740 (pause) was killed, but its > rss is only one page. That is because, when we calculate the oom badness in > oom_badness(), we always ignore the negtive point and convert all of these > negtive points to 1. Now as oom_score_adj of all the processes in this > targeted memcg have the same value -998, the points of these processes are > all negtive value. As a result, the first scanned process will be killed. > > The oom_socre_adj (-998) in this memcg is set by kubelet, because it is a > a Guaranteed pod, which has higher priority to prevent from being killed by > system oom. > > To fix this issue, we should make the calculation of oom point more > accurate. We can achieve it by convert the chosen_point from 'unsigned > long' to 'long'. > > Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/tty/sysrq.c | 1 + > fs/proc/base.c | 7 ++++++- > include/linux/oom.h | 4 ++-- > mm/memcontrol.c | 1 + > mm/oom_kill.c | 19 ++++++++----------- > mm/page_alloc.c | 1 + > 6 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c > index 7c95afa9..e83fd46 100644 > --- a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c > +++ b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c > @@ -382,6 +382,7 @@ static void moom_callback(struct work_struct *ignored) > .memcg = NULL, > .gfp_mask = gfp_mask, > .order = -1, > + .chosen_points = LONG_MIN, It would be better to do the initialization only once when we start evaluating tasks (select_bad_process). > }; > > mutex_lock(&oom_lock); > diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c > index d86c0af..bf16406 100644 > --- a/fs/proc/base.c > +++ b/fs/proc/base.c > @@ -551,8 +551,13 @@ static int proc_oom_score(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns, > { > unsigned long totalpages = totalram_pages() + total_swap_pages; > unsigned long points = 0; > + long badness; > > - points = oom_badness(task, totalpages) * 1000 / totalpages; > + badness = oom_badness(task, totalpages); > + if (badness != LONG_MIN) { > + /* Let's keep the range of points as [0, 2000]. */ > + points = (1000 + badness * 1000 / (long)totalpages) * 2 / 3; > + } > seq_printf(m, "%lu\n", points); This doesn't really work for OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN cases because they will simply print LONG_MIN rather than 0. So you want /* * Special case OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN for all others scale the * badness value into [0, 2000] range which we have been * exporting for a long time so userspace might depend on it */ if (badness == LONG_MIN) badness = 0; else points = (1000 + badness * 1000 / (long)totalpages) * 2 / 3 FTR. In my other email I was proposing to scale usage to the [-1000, 1000] range by points = adj + usage * 1000/ totalpages this would make the math slightly easier to follow but then I've realized that this would be much less precise so what you have is better. Btw. we used to do that in the past until a7f638f999ff4 which has changed that for this very reason. > @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static inline vm_fault_t check_stable_address_space(struct mm_struct *mm) > > bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct mm_struct *mm); > > -extern unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, > +long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, > unsigned long totalpages); This is not really necessary. With that being addressed, you can add Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> Thanks! -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs