Hi Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 11:39 AM
> To: Justin He <Justin.He@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@xxxxxxx>; Will Deacon
> <will@xxxxxxxxxx>; Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>; Fenghua Yu
> <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>; Yoshinori Sato <ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Rich
> Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx>; Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andy
> Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>; Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>; David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>; X86
> ML <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>; H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>; Vishal Verma
> <vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx>; Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>; Andrew
> Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>; Chuhong
> Yuan <hslester96@xxxxxxxxx>; Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Logan
> Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>; Linux ARM <linux-arm-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Linux-sh <linux-
> sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux MM
> <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>; Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>; Kaly
> Xin <Kaly.Xin@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] device-dax: use fallback nid when numa_node is
> invalid
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 7:07 PM Jia He <justin.he@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > numa_off is set unconditionally at the end of dummy_numa_init(),
> > even with a fake numa node. ACPI detects node id as NUMA_NO_NODE(-1) in
> > acpi_map_pxm_to_node() because it regards numa_off as turning off the
> numa
> > node. Hence dev_dax->target_node is NUMA_NO_NODE on arm64 with fake numa.
> >
> > Without this patch, pmem can't be probed as a RAM device on arm64 if
> SRAT table
> > isn't present:
> > $ndctl create-namespace -fe namespace0.0 --mode=devdax --map=dev -s 1g -
> a 64K
> > kmem dax0.0: rejecting DAX region [mem 0x240400000-0x2bfffffff] with
> invalid node: -1
> > kmem: probe of dax0.0 failed with error -22
> >
> > This fixes it by using fallback memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() as nid.
> >
> > Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jia He <justin.he@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/dax/kmem.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dax/kmem.c b/drivers/dax/kmem.c
> > index 275aa5f87399..218f66057994 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dax/kmem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dax/kmem.c
> > @@ -31,22 +31,23 @@ int dev_dax_kmem_probe(struct device *dev)
> > int numa_node;
> > int rc;
> >
> > + /* Hotplug starting at the beginning of the next block: */
> > + kmem_start = ALIGN(res->start, memory_block_size_bytes());
> > +
> > /*
> > * Ensure good NUMA information for the persistent memory.
> > * Without this check, there is a risk that slow memory
> > * could be mixed in a node with faster memory, causing
> > - * unavoidable performance issues.
> > + * unavoidable performance issues. Furthermore, fallback node
> > + * id can be used when numa_node is invalid.
> > */
> > numa_node = dev_dax->target_node;
> > if (numa_node < 0) {
> > - dev_warn(dev, "rejecting DAX region %pR with invalid
> node: %d\n",
> > - res, numa_node);
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + numa_node = memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(kmem_start);
>
> I think this fixup belongs to the core to set a fallback value for
> dev_dax->target_node.
>
> I'm close to having patches to provide a functional
> phys_addr_to_target_node() for arm64.
Should My this patch(5/6) wait on your new phys_addr_to_target_node() patch?
Thanks for the clarification.
--
Cheers,
Justin (Jia He)
