For anyone who may not have read the bugzilla, a possibly larger concern subsequently discovered is that actual kernel memory consumption is double the total of the values reported by 'netstat -nau', at least when mostly small packets are received and a RHEL 5 kernel is in use. The tunable enforces based on the 'netstat' value rather than the actual value in the RH kernel. Maybe not an issue in the mainline, but it took a few additional system hangs in the lab before we figured this out and divided the 'udm_mem' maximum value in half. At 04:03 PM 7/6/2011 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, >not via the bugzilla web interface). > >(cc's added) > >On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:35:22 GMT >bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38032 >> >> Summary: default values of >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/udp_mem does not >> consider huge page allocatio >> Product: Memory Management >> Version: 2.5 >> Platform: All >> OS/Version: Linux >> Tree: Mainline >> Status: NEW >> Severity: normal >> Priority: P1 >> Component: Other >> AssignedTo: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> ReportedBy: starlight@xxxxxxxxxxx >> Regression: No >> >> >> In the RHEL 5.5 back-port of this tunable we ran into trouble locking up >> systems because the boot-time default is set based on physical memory does not >> account for the hugepages= in the boot parameters. So the UDP socket buffer >> limit can exceed phyisical memory. Don't know if this is an issue in mainline >> kernels but it seems likely so reporting this as a courtesy. Seems like it >> would be easy to fix the default to account for the memory reserved by >> hugepages which is not available for slab allocations. >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714833 >> > >Yes, we've made similar mistakes in other places. > >I don't think we really have an official formula for what callers >should be doing here. net/ipv4/udp.c:udp_init() does > > nr_pages = totalram_pages - totalhigh_pages; > > >which assumes that totalram_pages does not include the pages which were >lost to hugepage allocations. > >I *think* that this is now the case, but it wasn't always the case - we >made relatively recent fixes to the totalram_pages maintenance. > >Perhaps UDP should be using the misnamed nr_free_buffer_pages() >here. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>