Re: [RFC 2/4] fs: Add IOCB_NOIO flag for generic_file_read_iter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 9:51 AM Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add an IOCB_NOIO flag that indicates to generic_file_read_iter that it
> shouldn't trigger any filesystem I/O for the actual request or for
> readahead.  This allows to do tentative reads out of the page cache as
> some filesystems allow, and to take the appropriate locks and retry the
> reads only if the requested pages are not cached.

This looks sane to me, except for this part:
>                 if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
> -                       if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT) {
> +                       if (iocb->ki_flags & (IOCB_NOWAIT | IOCB_NOIO)) {
>                                 put_page(page);
>                                 goto would_block;
>                         }

This path doesn't actually initiate reads at all - it waits for
existing reads to finish.

So I think it should only check for IOCB_NOWAIT.

Of course, if you want to avoid both new reads to be submitted _and_
avoid waiting for existing pending reads, you should just set both
flags, and you get the semantics you want. So for your case, this may
not make any difference.

But if the issue is a deadlock where the code can block for IO, but
not call back down to the filesystem for new IO (because it holds a
lock that the filesystem might need) then this patch as-is is wrong,
because it disallows even that case.

              Linus




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux