Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/8] mm/numa: automatically generate node migration order

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 6/30/20 1:22 AM, Huang, Ying wrote:
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * To avoid cycles in the migration "graph", ensure
>>> +	 * that migration sources are not future targets by
>>> +	 * setting them in 'used_targets'.
>>> +	 *
>>> +	 * But, do this only once per pass so that multiple
>>> +	 * source nodes can share a target node.
>> establish_migrate_target() calls find_next_best_node(), which will set
>> target_node in used_targets.  So it seems that the nodes_or() below is
>> only necessary to initialize used_targets, and multiple source nodes
>> cannot share one target node in current implementation.
>
> Yes, that is true.  My focus on this implementation was simplicity and
> sanity for common configurations.  I can certainly imagine scenarios
> where this is suboptimal.
>
> I'm totally open to other ways of doing this.

OK.  So when we really need to share one target node for multiple source
nodes, we can add a parameter to find_next_best_node() to specify
whether set target_node in used_targets.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux