On 6/17/20 7:26 AM, js1304@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> Hi, I would adjust the subject, as it sounds like the patch does the whole workingset detection, not just preparation. How about: mm/workingset: prepare the workingset infrastructure for anon LRU > In the following patch, workingset detection will be applied to > anonymous LRU. To prepare it, this patch adds some code to > distinguish/handle the both LRUs. How about: To prepare for this, this patch splits workingset event counters for refault, activate and restore into anon and file variants, as well as the refaults counter in struct lruvec. > v6: do not introduce a new nonresident_age for anon LRU since > we need to use *unified* nonresident_age to implement workingset > detection for anon LRU. Again, v6 update info shouldn't go to changelog. In this case I think it doesn't need mentioning at all, at least not in this patch. > Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
