[PATCH v2 0/2] s390/mm: don't set ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This series is based on the latest s390/features branch, which contains
"s390/zcore: remove memmap device". [1]

Looking into why we still create memblocks for stdnaby/hotplugged memory
(via add_memory()), I discovered that we might not need ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
on s390x after all.

This is relevant in the context of virtio-mem, where we hotplug a lot of
small memory blocks (and want to avoid managing unused metadata). But also
for existing setups, it might help to free up some memory after boot.

Compile-tested on s390x, pseries, arm64, i386, mips64, powernv, sh, and
x86_64.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git/commit/?h=features

v1 -> v2:
- "mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem"
-- Use inline function for __next_physmem_range
-- Rewrite some comments

RFC -> v1:
- "s390/zcore: traverse resources instead of memblocks" has been replaced
  on s390/features by "s390/zcore: remove memmap devic"
- Add "mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem"
-- Sort out section mismatch errors when using physmem after boot without
   ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
- "s390/mm: don't set ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK"
-- Rephrase description

David Hildenbrand (2):
  mm/memblock: expose only miminal interface to add/walk physmem
  s390/mm: don't set ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK

 arch/s390/Kconfig             |  1 -
 arch/s390/kernel/crash_dump.c |  6 ++--
 include/linux/memblock.h      | 28 ++++++++++++++---
 mm/memblock.c                 | 57 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

-- 
2.26.2





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux