On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 05:18:28PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>On Tue 23-06-20 17:42:58, Wei Yang wrote:
>> For early sections, we assumes its memmap will never be partially
>> removed. But current behavior breaks this.
>>
>> Let's correct it.
>>
>> Fixes: ba72b4c8cf60 ("mm/sparsemem: support sub-section hotplug")
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>Can a user trigger this or is this a theoretical bug?
>
I don't expect to have a non-section aligned system, so this is a theoretical
bug to me.
>> ---
>> mm/sparse.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
>> index b2b9a3e34696..1a0069f492f5 100644
>> --- a/mm/sparse.c
>> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
>> @@ -825,10 +825,10 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>> ms->section_mem_map &= ~SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP;
>> }
>>
>> - if (section_is_early && memmap)
>> - free_map_bootmem(memmap);
>> - else
>> + if (!section_is_early)
>
>This begs a comment.
>
Like:
/* Only depopulate sub-section memmap for non early section. */
Looks good to you?
>> depopulate_section_memmap(pfn, nr_pages, altmap);
>> + else if (memmap)
>> + free_map_bootmem(memmap);
>>
>> if (empty)
>> ms->section_mem_map = (unsigned long)NULL;
>> --
>> 2.20.1 (Apple Git-117)
>>
>
>--
>Michal Hocko
>SUSE Labs
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
