> > <snip> > > trace_rcu_invoke_kfree_bulk_callback( > > rcu_state.name, bkvhead[i]->nr_records, > > bkvhead[i]->records); > > if (i == 0) > > kfree_bulk(bkvhead[i]->nr_records, > > bkvhead[i]->records); > > else > > vfree_bulk(bkvhead[i]->nr_records, > > bkvhead[i]->records); > > <snip> > > > > Matthew, what is your thought? > > That was my thinking too. If we had a kvfree_bulk(), I would expect it to > handle a mixture of vfree and kfree, but you've segregated them already. > So I think this is better. > Yes, the segregation is done. Having vfree_bulk() is enough then. We are on the same page :) Thanks! -- Vlad Rezki
