Hi, I stumbled over the following: | static void free_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n) | { … | unsigned long *map = NULL; | | #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG | map = bitmap_alloc(oo_objects(s->max), GFP_KERNEL); | #endif … | } else { | list_slab_objects(s, page, | "Objects remaining in %s on __kmem_cache_shutdown()", | map); | } | } … | #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG | bitmap_free(map); | #endif … | } so map gets allocated, passed to list_slab_objects() and then freed at end. Haven't notices where `map' is set but maybe it is just a buffer used in list_slab_objects(). And then there is this: | static void list_slab_objects(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, | const char *text, unsigned long *map) | { | #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG | void *addr = page_address(page); | void *p; | | if (!map) | return; No map, return. Okay. | slab_err(s, page, text, s->name); | slab_lock(page); | | map = get_map(s, page); and here `map' gets overwritten, correct? But it gets initialized. And it also acquires `object_map_lock'. | for_each_object(p, s, addr, page->objects) { | | if (!test_bit(slab_index(p, s, addr), map)) { | pr_err("INFO: Object 0x%p @offset=%tu\n", p, p - addr); | print_tracking(s, p); | } | } and here I would expect to unlock `object_map_lock'. | slab_unlock(page); | #endif | } Is this a miss-merge of some kind? I would revert commit aa456c7aebb14 ("slub: remove kmalloc under list_lock from list_slab_objects() V2") by doing this: diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.h b/kernel/locking/rwsem.h deleted file mode 100644 index e69de29bb2d1d..0000000000000 diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c index b8f798b50d44d..72195cafbb503 100644 --- a/mm/slub.c +++ b/mm/slub.c @@ -3766,15 +3766,13 @@ static int kmem_cache_open(struct kmem_cache *s, slab_flags_t flags) } static void list_slab_objects(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, - const char *text, unsigned long *map) + const char *text) { #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG void *addr = page_address(page); + unsigned long *map; void *p; - if (!map) - return; - slab_err(s, page, text, s->name); slab_lock(page); @@ -3786,6 +3784,7 @@ static void list_slab_objects(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, print_tracking(s, p); } } + put_map(map); slab_unlock(page); #endif } @@ -3799,11 +3798,6 @@ static void free_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n) { LIST_HEAD(discard); struct page *page, *h; - unsigned long *map = NULL; - -#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG - map = bitmap_alloc(oo_objects(s->max), GFP_KERNEL); -#endif BUG_ON(irqs_disabled()); spin_lock_irq(&n->list_lock); @@ -3813,16 +3807,11 @@ static void free_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n) list_add(&page->slab_list, &discard); } else { list_slab_objects(s, page, - "Objects remaining in %s on __kmem_cache_shutdown()", - map); + "Objects remaining in %s on __kmem_cache_shutdown()"); } } spin_unlock_irq(&n->list_lock); -#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG - bitmap_free(map); -#endif - list_for_each_entry_safe(page, h, &discard, slab_list) discard_slab(s, page); } Is there something I'm missing? This is completely untested of course. Sebastian