On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 7:41 PM Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 06:46:56PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 4:07 PM Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > [...] > > > > Have you performed any [perf] testing on SLAB with this patchset? > > The accounting part is the same for SLAB and SLUB, so there should be no > significant difference. I've checked that it compiles, boots and passes > kselftests. And that memory savings are there. > What about performance? Also you mentioned that sharing kmem-cache between accounted and non-accounted can have additional overhead. Any difference between SLAB and SLUB for such a case?
