2020년 6월 15일 (월) 오후 10:41, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>님이 작성:
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 12:19:58PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > 2020년 6월 5일 (금) 오전 12:06, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>님이 작성:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 03:35:27PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > > > On 6/1/20 10:44 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > > > From a8faceabc1454dfd878caee2a8422493d937a394 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > > From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 14:04:09 -0400
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH] mm: workingset: let cache workingset challenge anon fix
> > > >
> > > > Looks like the whole series is now in mainline (that was quick!) without this
> > > > followup? As such it won't be squashed so perhaps the subject should be more
> > > > "standalone" now, description referencing commit 34e58cac6d8f ("mm: workingset:
> > > > let cache workingset challenge anon"), possibly with Fixes: tag etc...
> > >
> > > Yep, I'll send a stand-alone version of this. It was a bit fat to get
> > > squashed last minute anyway, and I don't mind having a bit of extra
> > > time to quantify the actual impact of this delta.
> >
> > Hello, Johannes.
> >
> > Now, a week has passed. I hope that this patch is merged as soon as possible,
> > since my WIP patchset depends on this patch. How about trying to merge
> > this patch now? If you don't mind, I could send it on your behalf.
>
> I didn't realize you directly depended on it, my apologies.
No problem.
> Do you depend on it code-wise or do you have test case that shows a
> the difference?
Code-wise. My patchset also requires activation counting for the anon
pages and conflict could occur in this case.
> Here is the latest version again, you can include it in your patch
> series until we get it merged. But I think we should be able to merge
> it as a follow-up fix into 5.8 still.
Yes. I will send it separately for 5.8. And, I will send some minor fixes, too.
It's appreciated if you review them.
Thanks.
