Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] blktrace: annotate required lock on do_blk_trace_setup()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, jack@xxxxxxx, ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx, nstange@xxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] blktrace: annotate required lock on do_blk_trace_setup()
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:54:27 -0700
Cc: mhocko@xxxxxxxx, yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20200608170127.20419-5-mcgrof@kernel.org>
References: <20200608170127.20419-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20200608170127.20419-5-mcgrof@kernel.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0

On 2020-06-08 10:01, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> Ensure it is clear which lock is required on do_blk_trace_setup().

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH v6 0/8] block: fix blktrace debugfs use after free
  - From: Luis Chamberlain
- [PATCH v6 4/6] blktrace: annotate required lock on do_blk_trace_setup()
  - From: Luis Chamberlain

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] block: revert back to synchronous request_queue removal
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] blktrace: fix debugfs use after free
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] blktrace: annotate required lock on do_blk_trace_setup()
Next by thread: [PATCH v6 5/6] loop: be paranoid on exit and prevent new additions / removals
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux