Re: [PATCH v2 08/12] mm/migrate: change the interface of the migration target alloc/free functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed 27-05-20 15:44:59, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
> 
> To prepare unifying duplicated functions in following patches, this patch
> changes the interface of the migration target alloc/free functions.
> Functions now use struct alloc_control as an argument.

It also pulls private argument into alloc_control and keeps it that way.
Wouldn't it be better to use explicit types and names in a union? Each
allocation callback has to understant the meaning anyway. I would
consider the resulting code cleaner that way. What do you think?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux