On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:24:24AM +0100, P?draig Brady wrote: >> On 24/06/11 10:27, Minchan Kim wrote: >> > Hi Andrew, >> > >> > Sorry but right now I don't have a time to dive into this. >> > But it seems to be similar to the problem Mel is looking at. >> > Cced him. >> > >> > Even, Pádraig Brady seem to have a reproducible scenario. >> > I will look when I have a time. >> > I hope I will be back sooner or later. >> >> My reproducer is (I've 3GB RAM, 1.5G swap): >> dd bs=1M count=3000 if=/dev/zero of=spin.test >> >> To stop it spinning I just have to uncache the data, >> the handiest way being: >> rm spin.test >> >> To confirm, the top of the profile I posted is: >> i915_gem_object_bind_to_gtt >> shrink_slab >> > > I don't think it's an i915 bug. Another candidate fix in the other > thread that Padraig started. I bet you're right. I do indeed have a tiny high zone. (No clue why -- I have 2G of ram right now.) I won't be a reliable tester because I don't have a good way to reproduce this bug. --Andy -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href