2011/6/24 Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>: > Sorry, forgot to send my > Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse> > Thanks. > I still have concerns about this way to handle the issue. See the follow > up discussion in other thread (https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/23/135). > > Anyway I think that we do not have many other options to handle this. > Either we unlock, charge, lock&restes or we preallocate, fault in > I agree. > Or am I missing some other ways how to do it? What do others think about > these approaches? > Yes, I'd like to hear other mm specialists' suggestion. and I'll think other way, again. Anyway, memory reclaim with holding a lock_page() can cause big latency or starvation especially when memcg is used. It's better to avoid it. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>