On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 05:02:29PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 16:32 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > Using uninitialized_var() is dangerous as it papers over real bugs[1] > > (or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated compiler warnings > > (e.g. "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it is uninitialized, > > either simply initialize the variable or make compiler changes. > > > > In preparation for removing[2] the[3] macro[4], effectively revert > > commit 16b7f3c89907 ("checkpatch: avoid warning about uninitialized_var()") > > and remove all remaining mentions of uninitialized_var(). > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200603174714.192027-1-glider@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw+Vbj0i=1TGqCR5vQkCzWJ0QxK6CernOU6eedsudAixw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwgbgqhbp1fkxvRKEpzyR5J8n1vKT1VZdz9knmPuXhOeg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yVJu65TpLgN_ybYNv0VEOKA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > nack. see below. > > I'd prefer a simple revert, but it shouldn't > be done here. What do you mean? (I can't understand this and "fine by me" below?) > > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl > [] > > @@ -4075,7 +4074,7 @@ sub process { > > } > > > > # check for function declarations without arguments like "int foo()" > > - if ($line =~ /(\b$Type\s*$Ident)\s*\(\s*\)/) { > > + if ($line =~ /(\b$Type\s+$Ident)\s*\(\s*\)/) { > > This isn't right because $Type includes a possible trailing * > where there isn't a space between $Type and $Ident Ah, hm, that was changed in the mentioned commit: - if ($line =~ /(\b$Type\s+$Ident)\s*\(\s*\)/) { + if ($line =~ /(\b$Type\s*$Ident)\s*\(\s*\)/) { > > e.g.: int *bar(void); > > Other than that, fine by me... Thanks for looking it over! I'll adjust it however you'd like. :) -- Kees Cook