On 06/03/2020 08:27 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 06:56:57AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> On 06/02/2020 08:31 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >>> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 09:04:04AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>>> This adds the following two new VM events which will help in validating PMD >>>> based THP migration without split. Statistics reported through these events >>>> will help in performance debugging. >>>> >>>> 1. THP_PMD_MIGRATION_SUCCESS >>>> 2. THP_PMD_MIGRATION_FAILURE >>> >>> There's nothing actually PMD specific about these events, is there? >>> If we have a THP of a non-PMD size, you'd want that reported through the >>> same statistic, wouldn't you? >> >> Yes, there is nothing PMD specific here and we would use the same statistics >> for non-PMD size THP migration (if any) as well. But is THP migration really >> supported for non-PMD sizes ? CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION depends upon >> CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE without being specific or denying about possible >> PUD level support. Fair enough, will drop the PMD from the events and their >> functions. > > I guess you haven't read my large pages patchset? I believe you are referring this "[PATCH v5 00/39] Large pages in the page cache" (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/28/1755). Unfortunately, I have not been following the series. But is there something else in particular that needs to be taken care of as well ?