On Tue, 02 Jun 2020 15:55:27 +1000 Daniel Axtens <dja@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Huh, turns out that we do actually see a similar set of warnings before > and after this patch, they're just different warnings as a consequence > of my patch. Ah. > Given that these warnings only show up at W=1, is there any point in > further supressing them? I guess not. So what should we do? Go over the various sites and use memcpy(), each with a suitably apologetic code comment explaining the reason?
