Rename kvfree_rcu() function to the kvfree_rcu_local() one.
The purpose is to prevent a conflict of two same function
declarations. The kvfree_rcu() will be globally visible
what would lead to a build error. No functional change.
Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: rcu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/list_lru.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c
index 4d5294c39bba..42c95bcb53ca 100644
--- a/mm/list_lru.c
+++ b/mm/list_lru.c
@@ -373,14 +373,14 @@ static void memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru)
struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus;
/*
* This is called when shrinker has already been unregistered,
- * and nobody can use it. So, there is no need to use kvfree_rcu().
+ * and nobody can use it. So, there is no need to use kvfree_rcu_local().
*/
memcg_lrus = rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, true);
__memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(memcg_lrus, 0, memcg_nr_cache_ids);
kvfree(memcg_lrus);
}
-static void kvfree_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
+static void kvfree_rcu_local(struct rcu_head *head)
{
struct list_lru_memcg *mlru;
@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ static int memcg_update_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru,
rcu_assign_pointer(nlru->memcg_lrus, new);
spin_unlock_irq(&nlru->lock);
- call_rcu(&old->rcu, kvfree_rcu);
+ call_rcu(&old->rcu, kvfree_rcu_local);
return 0;
}
--
2.20.1
