On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> > I have a couple of thoughts here: > > - If this patchset is merged and a major user such as google is > unable to use it and has to continue to carry a separate patch then > that's a regrettable situation for the upstream kernel. > > - Google's is, afaik, the largest use case we know of: zillions of > machines for a number of years. And this real-world experience tells > us that the badram patchset has shortcomings. Shortcomings which we > can expect other users to experience. > > So. What are your thoughts on these issues? Has Google submitted patches for their implementation? josh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href