Re: [RFC 09/16] KVM: Protected memory extension

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 05:26:37PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Add infrastructure that handles protected memory extension.
> >
> > Arch-specific code has to provide hypercalls and define non-zero
> > VM_KVM_PROTECTED.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/kvm_host.h |   4 ++
> >  mm/mprotect.c            |   1 +
> >  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c      | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 136 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > index bd0bb600f610..d7072f6d6aa0 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -700,6 +700,10 @@ void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all(struct kvm *kvm);
> >  void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
> >  				   struct kvm_memory_slot *slot);
> >  
> > +int kvm_protect_all_memory(struct kvm *kvm);
> > +int kvm_protect_memory(struct kvm *kvm,
> > +		       unsigned long gfn, unsigned long npages, bool protect);
> > +
> >  int gfn_to_page_many_atomic(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
> >  			    struct page **pages, int nr_pages);
> >  
> > diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
> > index 494192ca954b..552be3b4c80a 100644
> > --- a/mm/mprotect.c
> > +++ b/mm/mprotect.c
> > @@ -505,6 +505,7 @@ mprotect_fixup(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_area_struct **pprev,
> >  	vm_unacct_memory(charged);
> >  	return error;
> >  }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mprotect_fixup);
> >  
> >  /*
> >   * pkey==-1 when doing a legacy mprotect()
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > index 530af95efdf3..07d45da5d2aa 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ static void kvm_uevent_notify_change(unsigned int type, struct kvm *kvm);
> >  static unsigned long long kvm_createvm_count;
> >  static unsigned long long kvm_active_vms;
> >  
> > +static int protect_memory(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool protect);
> > +
> >  __weak int kvm_arch_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(struct kvm *kvm,
> >  		unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool blockable)
> >  {
> > @@ -1309,6 +1311,14 @@ int __kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
> >  	if (r)
> >  		goto out_bitmap;
> >  
> > +	if (mem->memory_size && kvm->mem_protected) {
> > +		r = protect_memory(new.userspace_addr,
> > +				   new.userspace_addr + new.npages * PAGE_SIZE,
> > +				   true);
> > +		if (r)
> > +			goto out_bitmap;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	if (old.dirty_bitmap && !new.dirty_bitmap)
> >  		kvm_destroy_dirty_bitmap(&old);
> >  	return 0;
> > @@ -2652,6 +2662,127 @@ void kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty);
> >  
> > +static int protect_memory(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool protect)
> > +{
> > +	struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> > +	struct vm_area_struct *vma, *prev;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	if (down_write_killable(&mm->mmap_sem))
> > +		return -EINTR;
> > +
> > +	ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +	vma = find_vma(current->mm, start);
> > +	if (!vma)
> > +		goto out;
> > +
> > +	ret = -EINVAL;
> > +	if (vma->vm_start > start)
> > +		goto out;
> > +
> > +	if (start > vma->vm_start)
> > +		prev = vma;
> > +	else
> > +		prev = vma->vm_prev;
> > +
> > +	ret = 0;
> > +	while (true) {
> > +		unsigned long newflags, tmp;
> > +
> > +		tmp = vma->vm_end;
> > +		if (tmp > end)
> > +			tmp = end;
> > +
> > +		newflags = vma->vm_flags;
> > +		if (protect)
> > +			newflags |= VM_KVM_PROTECTED;
> > +		else
> > +			newflags &= ~VM_KVM_PROTECTED;
> > +
> > +		/* The VMA has been handled as part of other memslot */
> > +		if (newflags == vma->vm_flags)
> > +			goto next;
> > +
> > +		ret = mprotect_fixup(vma, &prev, start, tmp, newflags);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			goto out;
> > +
> > +next:
> > +		start = tmp;
> > +		if (start < prev->vm_end)
> > +			start = prev->vm_end;
> > +
> > +		if (start >= end)
> > +			goto out;
> > +
> > +		vma = prev->vm_next;
> > +		if (!vma || vma->vm_start != start) {
> > +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +			goto out;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +out:
> > +	up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int kvm_protect_memory(struct kvm *kvm,
> > +		       unsigned long gfn, unsigned long npages, bool protect)
> > +{
> > +	struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
> > +	unsigned long start, end;
> > +	gfn_t numpages;
> > +
> > +	if (!VM_KVM_PROTECTED)
> > +		return -KVM_ENOSYS;
> > +
> > +	if (!npages)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	memslot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn);
> > +	/* Not backed by memory. It's okay. */
> > +	if (!memslot)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	start = gfn_to_hva_many(memslot, gfn, &numpages);
> > +	end = start + npages * PAGE_SIZE;
> > +
> > +	/* XXX: Share range across memory slots? */
> > +	if (WARN_ON(numpages < npages))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	return protect_memory(start, end, protect);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_protect_memory);
> > +
> > +int kvm_protect_all_memory(struct kvm *kvm)
> > +{
> > +	struct kvm_memslots *slots;
> > +	struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
> > +	unsigned long start, end;
> > +	int i, ret = 0;;
> > +
> > +	if (!VM_KVM_PROTECTED)
> > +		return -KVM_ENOSYS;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> > +	kvm->mem_protected = true;
> 
> What will happen upon guest reboot? Do we need to unprotect everything
> to make sure we'll be able to boot? Also, after the reboot how will the
> guest know that it is protected and needs to unprotect things? -> see my
> idea about converting KVM_HC_ENABLE_MEM_PROTECTED to a stateful MSR (but
> we'll likely have to reset it upon reboot anyway).

That's extremely good question. I have not considered reboot. I tend to use
-no-reboot in my setup.

I'll think how to deal with reboot. I don't know how it works now to give
a good answer.

The may not be a good solution: unprotecting memory on reboot means we
expose user data. We can wipe the data before unprotecting, but we should
not wipe BIOS and anything else that is required on reboot. I donno.

> > +	for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++) {
> > +		slots = __kvm_memslots(kvm, i);
> > +		kvm_for_each_memslot(memslot, slots) {
> > +			start = memslot->userspace_addr;
> > +			end = start + memslot->npages * PAGE_SIZE;
> > +			ret = protect_memory(start, end, true);
> > +			if (ret)
> > +				goto out;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +out:
> > +	mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_protect_all_memory);
> > +
> >  void kvm_sigset_activate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  {
> >  	if (!vcpu->sigset_active)
> 
> -- 
> Vitaly
> 
> 

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux