* Izik Eidus (izik.eidus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On 6/22/2011 3:21 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
> >* Nai Xia (nai.xia@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> >>+ if (!shadow_dirty_mask) {
> >>+ WARN(1, "KVM: do NOT try to test dirty bit in EPT\n");
> >>+ goto out;
> >>+ }
> >This should never fire with the dirty_update() notifier test, right?
> >And that means that this whole optimization is for the shadow mmu case,
> >arguably the legacy case.
>
> Hi Chris,
> AMD npt does track the dirty bit in the nested page tables,
> so the shadow_dirty_mask should not be 0 in that case...
Yeah, momentary lapse... ;)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>