On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 03:44:02AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > +static void sgx_reclaimer_write(struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page, > + struct sgx_backing *backing) > +{ > + struct sgx_encl_page *encl_page = epc_page->owner; > + struct sgx_encl *encl = encl_page->encl; > + struct sgx_backing secs_backing; > + int ret; > + > + mutex_lock(&encl->lock); > + > + if (atomic_read(&encl->flags) & SGX_ENCL_DEAD) { > + ret = __eremove(sgx_epc_addr(epc_page)); > + ENCLS_WARN(ret, "EREMOVE returned %d\n"); The " returned %d\n" is unnecessary and leads to a bad message, ENCLS_WARN handles the message and formatting, i.e. this should simply be: ENCLS_WARN(ret, "EREMOVE"); > + } else { > + sgx_encl_ewb(epc_page, backing); > + } > + > + encl_page->epc_page = NULL; > + encl->secs_child_cnt--;