Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:15:02AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
>> @@ -2827,6 +2865,11 @@ static struct swap_info_struct *alloc_swap_info(void)
>> p = kvzalloc(struct_size(p, avail_lists, nr_node_ids), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!p)
>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> + p->cluster_next_cpu = alloc_percpu(unsigned int);
>> + if (!p->cluster_next_cpu) {
>> + kvfree(p);
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> + }
>
> There should be free_percpu()s at two places after this, but I think the
> allocation really belongs right...
>
>> @@ -3202,7 +3245,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(swapon, const char __user *, specialfile, int, swap_flags)
>> * select a random position to start with to help wear leveling
>> * SSD
>> */
>> - p->cluster_next = 1 + prandom_u32_max(p->highest_bit);
>
> ...here because then it's only allocated when it's actually used.
Good catch! And yes, this is the better place to allocate memory. I
will fix this in the new version! Thanks a lot!
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
>> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> + per_cpu(*p->cluster_next_cpu, cpu) =
>> + 1 + prandom_u32_max(p->highest_bit);
>> + }
>> nr_cluster = DIV_ROUND_UP(maxpages, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
>>
>> cluster_info = kvcalloc(nr_cluster, sizeof(*cluster_info),
>> --
>> 2.26.2
>>
>>
