On 5/17/20 6:20 PM, js1304@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> > > There is a user who do not want to use CMA memory for migration. Until > now, it is implemented by caller side but it's not optimal since there > is limited information on caller. This patch implements it on callee side > to get better result. > > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> Thank you! Avoiding CMA works much better with this new skip_cma field. Acked-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Mike Kravetz
