On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:03:30 +0200, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
What I was wondering about is how this patch series changes the
allocation in case it can't allocate from the CMA pool. Will it
attempt to fall back to a 'normal' allocation?
Unless Marek changed something since I wrote the code, which I doubt,
if CMA cannot obtain memory from CMA region, it will fail.
Part of the reason is that CMA lacks the knowledge where to allocate
memory from. For instance, with the case of several memory banks,
it does not know which memory bank to allocate from.
It is, in my opinion, a task for a higher level functions (read:
DMA layer) to try another mechanism if CMA fails.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +-----<email/xmpp: mnazarewicz@xxxxxxxxxx>-----ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>