On Mon, 18 May 2020 14:13:50 -0700 Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Andrew, I sent this patch without folding into previous syscall introducing > patches because it could be arguable. If you want to fold it into each > patchset(i.e., introdcuing process_madvise syscall and introducing > compat_syscall), let me know it. I will send partial diff to each > patchset. It doesn't seem necessary - I believe we'll get a clean result if I squish all of these: mm-support-vector-address-ranges-for-process_madvise-fix.patch mm-support-vector-address-ranges-for-process_madvise-fix-fix.patch mm-support-vector-address-ranges-for-process_madvise-fix-fix-fix.patch mm-support-vector-address-ranges-for-process_madvise-fix-fix-fix-fix.patch mm-support-vector-address-ranges-for-process_madvise-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix.patch mm-use-only-pidfd-for-process_madvise-syscall.patch into mm-support-vector-address-ranges-for-process_madvise.patch and make the appropriate changelog adjustments?
