On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 18:31 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> @@ -844,6 +845,19 @@ do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, void *unused, __u32 thread_info_flags)
> if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_SIGPENDING)
> do_signal(regs);
>
> + if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_UPROBE) {
> + clear_thread_flag(TIF_UPROBE);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> + /*
> + * On x86_32, do_notify_resume() gets called with
> + * interrupts disabled. Hence enable interrupts if they
> + * are still disabled.
> + */
> + local_irq_enable();
> +#endif
> + uprobe_notify_resume(regs);
> + }
Would it make sense to do TIF_UPROBE before TIF_SIGPENDING? That way
when uprobe decides it ought to have send a signal we don't have to do
another loop through all this.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href