Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue 12-05-20 14:41:46, Huang Ying wrote: >> To improve the code readability and get random number with higher >> quality. > > I understand the readability argument but why should prandom_u32_max > (which I was not aware of) provide a higher quality randomness? I am not expert on random number generator. I have heard about that the randomness of the low order bits of some random number generator isn't good enough. Anyway, by using the common implementation, the real random number generator expert can fix the possible issue once for all users. >> Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> > > To the change itself > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> Thanks! Best Regards, Huang, Ying >> --- >> mm/swapfile.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c >> index a0a123e59ce6..2ec8b21201d6 100644 >> --- a/mm/swapfile.c >> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c >> @@ -3220,7 +3220,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(swapon, const char __user *, specialfile, int, swap_flags) >> * select a random position to start with to help wear leveling >> * SSD >> */ >> - p->cluster_next = 1 + (prandom_u32() % p->highest_bit); >> + p->cluster_next = 1 + prandom_u32_max(p->highest_bit); >> nr_cluster = DIV_ROUND_UP(maxpages, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER); >> >> cluster_info = kvcalloc(nr_cluster, sizeof(*cluster_info), >> -- >> 2.26.2
