Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm: Two small fixes for recent syzbot reports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 2:34 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:12:50 +0200 Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > AI: we need to CC linux-next@ on linux-next build/boot failures. I
> > will work on this.
> > We have functionality to CC given emails on _all_ bugs on the given
> > tree, but we don't have this for build/boot bugs only. I will try to
> > add this soon.
> > Stephen, do you want to be CCed as well? Or just linux-next@?
>
> Please cc me as well, thanks.

To close the loop: I implemented and deployed 2 improvements:

1. Notion of per-repo "build maintainers":
https://github.com/google/syzkaller/commit/88cb3e92ba25303ab67aaceb083fe7304fccd32f
Now linux-next@ and Stephen should be CCed on all linux-next breakages
automatically.

2. Finding maintainers for build errors:
https://github.com/google/syzkaller/commit/65a44e22ba217ef7272b9d3735e9d12cfaa204f6
syzbot will attempt to extract the broken file name from make output
and then run get_matainers.pl on it to find relevant emails.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux