On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:32 AM Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Generic KASAN will support to record first and last call_rcu() call > stack and print them in KASAN report. so we update documentation. > > Signed-off-by: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst > index c652d740735d..d4efcfde9fff 100644 > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst > @@ -193,6 +193,12 @@ function calls GCC directly inserts the code to check the shadow memory. > This option significantly enlarges kernel but it gives x1.1-x2 performance > boost over outline instrumented kernel. > > +Currently Currently is excessive here. Everything in the doc is about the current state of the things. > generic KASAN can print call_rcu() s/can print/prints/ > call stack in KASAN report, it KASAN is implied for "report" in this doc. s/KASAN// > +can't increase the cost of memory consumption, It does not increase only as compared to the current state of things. But strictly saying, if we now take the call_rcu stacks away, we can reduce memory consumption. This statement is confusing because stacks consume memory. > but it has one limitations. > +It can't get both call_rcu() call stack and free stack, so that it can't > +print free stack for allocation objects in KASAN report. 1. This sentence produces the impression that KASAN does not print free stack for freed objects. KASAN does still print free stack for freed objects. 2. This sentence is mostly relevant as diff on top of the current situation and thus more suitable for the commit description. We never promise to print free stack for allocated objects. And free stack for allocated objects is not an immediately essential thing either. So for a reader of this doc, this is not a limitation. > This feature is > +only suitable for generic KASAN. We already mentioned "generic" in the first sentence. So this is excessive. This paragraph can be reduced to: "Generic KASAN prints up to 2 call_rcu() call stacks in reports, the first and the last one." The rest belongs to change description and is only interesting as a historic reference. Generally documentation does not accumulate everything that happened since the creation of the world :) > Software tag-based KASAN > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > -- > 2.18.0 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kasan-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kasan-dev+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kasan-dev/20200511023231.15437-1-walter-zh.wu%40mediatek.com.
