> On May 7, 2020, at 1:16 PM, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > I don't mind adding additional tracking info if it helps with debugging. > But if it's for improving false positives, I'd prefer to look deeper > into figure out why the pointer reference graph tracking failed. No, the task struct leaks are real leaks. It is just painful to figure out the missing or misplaced put_task_struct() from the kmemleak reports at the moment.
