Re: [PATCH 08/24] rcu/tree: Use static initializer for krc.lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/24] rcu/tree: Use static initializer for krc.lock
From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 14:10:55 +0200
Cc: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@xxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, RCU <rcu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20200501211703.GC7560@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
References: <20200428205903.61704-1-urezki@gmail.com> <20200428205903.61704-9-urezki@gmail.com> <20200501211703.GC7560@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

> >  
> > -	local_irq_save(*flags);	// For safely calling this_cpu_ptr().
> > +	local_irq_save(*flags);	/* For safely calling this_cpu_ptr(). */
> 
> And here as well.  ;-)
> 
OK. For me it works either way. I can stick to "//" :)

--
Vlad Rezki

References:
- [PATCH 00/24] Introduce kvfree_rcu(1 or 2 arguments)
  - From: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
- [PATCH 08/24] rcu/tree: Use static initializer for krc.lock
  - From: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
- Re: [PATCH 08/24] rcu/tree: Use static initializer for krc.lock
  - From: Paul E. McKenney

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmstat: Use zeroed stats for unpopulated zones
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm, memcg: don't try to kill a process if memcg is not populated
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 08/24] rcu/tree: Use static initializer for krc.lock
Next by thread: [PATCH 09/24] rcu/tree: cache specified number of objects
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]