Because enable_swap_slots_cache can only become true in enable_swap_slots_cache(), and depends on swap_slot_cache_initialized is true before. That means, when enable_swap_slots_cache is true, swap_slot_cache_initialized is true also. So the condition: "swap_slot_cache_enabled && swap_slot_cache_initialized" can be reduced to "swap_slot_cache_enabled" And in mathematics: "!swap_slot_cache_enabled || !swap_slot_cache_initialized" is equal to "!(swap_slot_cache_enabled && swap_slot_cache_initialized)" So no functional change. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/swap_slots.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/swap_slots.c b/mm/swap_slots.c index b40394473a3c..3e6453573a89 100644 --- a/mm/swap_slots.c +++ b/mm/swap_slots.c @@ -46,8 +46,7 @@ static void __drain_swap_slots_cache(unsigned int type); static void deactivate_swap_slots_cache(void); static void reactivate_swap_slots_cache(void); -#define use_swap_slot_cache (swap_slot_cache_active && \ - swap_slot_cache_enabled && swap_slot_cache_initialized) +#define use_swap_slot_cache (swap_slot_cache_active && swap_slot_cache_enabled) #define SLOTS_CACHE 0x1 #define SLOTS_CACHE_RET 0x2 @@ -94,7 +93,7 @@ static bool check_cache_active(void) { long pages; - if (!swap_slot_cache_enabled || !swap_slot_cache_initialized) + if (!swap_slot_cache_enabled) return false; pages = get_nr_swap_pages(); -- 2.26.0.106.g9fadedd