On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > And regardless of the patch path that is taken, update test(s) if > > applicable. Thanks for the links, Randy, I hadn't thought of those at all. > > I thought that someone from Red Hat had a kernel loadable > > module for testing radix-tree -- or maybe that was for rbtree (?) -- > > but I can't find that just now. > > http://people.redhat.com/jmoyer/radix-tree/ This one just tests that radix_tree_preload() goes deep enough: not affected by the little change I've made. > > And one Andrew Morton has a userspace radix tree test harness at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/rtth.tar.gz This should still be as relevant as it was before, but I notice its radix_tree.c is almost identical to the source currently in the kernel tree, so I ought at the least to keep it in synch. Whether there's anything suitable for testing here in the changes that I've made, I'll have to look into later. Hugh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>