Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 5:45 PM Daniel Axtens <dja@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> memcmp may bail out before accessing all the memory if the buffers
>> contain differing bytes. kasan_memcmp calls memcmp with a stack array.
>> Stack variables are not necessarily initialised (in the absence of a
>> compiler plugin, at least). Sometimes this causes the memcpy to bail
>> early thus fail to trigger kasan.
>>
>> Make sure the array initialised to zero in the code.
>>
>> No other test is dependent on the contents of an array on the stack.
>>
>> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> lib/test_kasan.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/test_kasan.c b/lib/test_kasan.c
>> index 939f395a5392..7700097842c8 100644
>> --- a/lib/test_kasan.c
>> +++ b/lib/test_kasan.c
>> @@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ static noinline void __init kasan_memcmp(void)
>> {
>> char *ptr;
>> size_t size = 24;
>> - int arr[9];
>> + int arr[9] = {};
>>
>> pr_info("out-of-bounds in memcmp\n");
>> ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
>
> My version of this function contains the following below:
>
> memset(arr, 0, sizeof(arr));
>
> What am I missing?
Ah! It turns out I accidentally removed the memset in patch 1. No idea
why I did that. I'll fix up patch 1 to not remove the memset and drop
this patch.
Daniel
