On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 9:02 PM Chris Down <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yafang Shao writes: > >That is what I did in the previous version, see also > >https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200414015952.3590-1-laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx/ > > Your v1 patch was significantly less complicated and self-contained, and I > would ack it (whereas I wouldn't ack this because it really complicates matters > for localevents). My only questions were around quantifying the issue in the > changelog :-) The user tools parsing the memory.oom_control will be affected. I thought I have explained it clearly in the changelog :) -- Thanks Yafang
