On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 03:00:40PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 21-04-20 14:47:13, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > [...] > > In that case the generic implementation should be just reverted to be simple and > > not assume any (micro)architectural details. If any architecture wants an > > optimized version they could add it opt-in, and justifify it by using real > > workloads, not microbenchmarks. > > Exactly! And I have requested that already with no response. So can we > simply go and make the current implementation x86 specific and > reintroduce the previous one as a default? Works for me as well, I just didn't want a special arm64 implementation based on one specific micro-architecture. Will