On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:38:53AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> 2020년 4월 17일 (금) 오전 1:11, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>님이 작성:
> >
> > Hello Joonsoo,
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 02:40:43PM +0900, js1304@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ void show_swap_cache_info(void)
> > > * but sets SwapCache flag and private instead of mapping and index.
> > > */
> > > int add_to_swap_cache(struct page *page, swp_entry_t entry,
> > > - gfp_t gfp, void **shadowp)
> > > + struct vm_area_struct *vma, gfp_t gfp, void **shadowp)
> > > {
> > > struct address_space *address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
> > > pgoff_t idx = swp_offset(entry);
> > > @@ -120,14 +120,26 @@ int add_to_swap_cache(struct page *page, swp_entry_t entry,
> > > unsigned long i, nr = compound_nr(page);
> > > unsigned long nrexceptional = 0;
> > > void *old;
> > > + bool compound = !!compound_order(page);
> > > + int error;
> > > + struct mm_struct *mm = vma ? vma->vm_mm : current->mm;
> > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> > >
> > > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
> > > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageSwapCache(page), page);
> > > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageSwapBacked(page), page);
> > >
> > > page_ref_add(page, nr);
> > > + /* PageSwapCache() prevent the page from being re-charged */
> > > SetPageSwapCache(page);
> > >
> > > + error = mem_cgroup_try_charge(page, mm, gfp, &memcg, compound);
> > > + if (error) {
> > > + ClearPageSwapCache(page);
> > > + page_ref_sub(page, nr);
> > > + return error;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > do {
> > > xas_lock_irq(&xas);
> > > xas_create_range(&xas);
> > > @@ -153,11 +165,16 @@ int add_to_swap_cache(struct page *page, swp_entry_t entry,
> > > xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
> > > } while (xas_nomem(&xas, gfp));
> > >
> > > - if (!xas_error(&xas))
> > > + if (!xas_error(&xas)) {
> > > + mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, compound);
> >
> > Unfortunately you cannot commit here yet because the rmap isn't set up
> > and that will cause memcg_charge_statistics() to account the page
> > incorrectly as file. And rmap is only set up during a page fault.
>
> I also found this problem a few days ago. In my investigation, what we need for
> anonymous page to make accounting correct is a way to find the type of the page,
> file or anon, since there is no special code to use the rmap. And, I
> think that it
> could be done by checking NULL mapping or something else.
page->mapping is NULL for truncated file pages, file pages before they
are inserted into the page cache, and anon pages before the rmap. It's
not straight-forward to robustly tell those apart inside memcg.
But fundamentally, it's a silly problem to fix. We only need to tell
page types apart to maintain the MEMCG_CACHE and MEMCG_RSS
counters. But these are unnecessary duplicates of the NR_FILE_PAGES
and NR_ANON_MAPPED vmstat counters - counters for which we already
have accounting sites in generic code, and that already exist in the
per-cgroup vmstat arrays. We just need to link them.
So that's what I'm fixing instead: I'm adjusting the charging sequence
slightly so that page->mem_cgroup is stable when the core VM code
accounts pages by type. And then I'm hooking into these places with
mod_lruvec_page_state and friends, and ditching MEMCG_CACHE/MEMCG_RSS.
After that, memcg doesn't have to know about the types of pages at
all. It can focus on maintaining page_counters and page->mem_cgroup,
and leave the vmstat breakdown to generic VM code.
Then we can charge pages right after allocation, regardless of type.
[ Eventually, the memcg accounting interface shouldn't be much more
than GFP_ACCOUNT (with memalloc_use_memcg() for faults, swap etc.),
and the vmstat hooks. My patches don't quite get there, but that's
the direction they're pushing. ]
> Is there anything I missed? And, I cannot find the function,
> memcg_charge_statistics(). Please let me know the file name of this
> function.
The correct name is mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(), my apologies.
> > This needs a bit of a rework of the memcg charging code that appears
> > out of scope for your patches. I'm preparing a series right now to do
> > just that. It'll also fix the swap ownership tracking problem when the
> > swap controller is disabled, so we don't have to choose between
> > charging the wrong cgroup or hampering swap readahead efficiency.
>
> Sound good! I also think that these patches are out of scope of my series.
> I will wait your patches. Could you let me know when your series is submitted?
> I'd like to plan my work schedule based on your patch schedule.
I just finished the first draft of the series a few minutes ago. I'll
polish it a bit, make sure it compiles etc. ;-), and send it out for
review, testing and rebasing, hopefully tomorrow or early next week.
