Re: [PATCH] slob: push the min alignment to long long

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:55:55 -0500

> In general, I think the right thing is to require every arch to
> explicitly document its alignment requirements via defines in the kernel
> headers so that random hackers don't have to scour the internet for
> datasheets on obscure architectures they don't care about.

Blink... because the compiler doesn't provide a portable way to
do this, right? :-)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]