On 15.04.20 01:58, Vishal Verma wrote:
> A misbehaving qemu created a situation where the ACPI SRAT table
> advertised one fewer proximity domains than intended. The NFIT table did
> describe all the expected proximity domains. This caused the device dax
> driver to assign an impossible target_node to the device, and when
> hotplugged as system memory, this would fail with the following
> signature:
>
> [ +0.001627] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000088
> [ +0.001331] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [ +0.000975] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> [ +0.000976] PGD 80000001767d4067 P4D 80000001767d4067 PUD 10e0c4067 PMD 0
> [ +0.001338] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
> [ +0.000676] CPU: 4 PID: 22737 Comm: kswapd3 Tainted: G O 5.6.0-rc5 #9
> [ +0.001457] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
> BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
> [ +0.001990] RIP: 0010:prepare_kswapd_sleep+0x7c/0xc0
> [ +0.000780] Code: 89 df e8 87 fd ff ff 89 c2 31 c0 84 d2 74 e6 0f 1f 44
> 00 00 48 8b 05 fb af 7a 01 48 63 93 88 1d 01 00 48 8b
> 84 d0 20 0f 00 00 <48> 3b 98 88 00 00 00 75 28 f0 80 a0
> 80 00 00 00 fe f0 80 a3 38 20
> [ +0.002877] RSP: 0018:ffffc900017a3e78 EFLAGS: 00010202
> [ +0.000805] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8881209e0000 RCX: 0000000000000000
> [ +0.001115] RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8881209e0e80
> [ +0.001098] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000008000
> [ +0.001092] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: 0000000000000003
> [ +0.001092] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffc900017a3ec8
> [ +0.001091] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888318c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ +0.001275] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ +0.000882] CR2: 0000000000000088 CR3: 0000000120b50002 CR4: 00000000001606e0
> [ +0.001095] Call Trace:
> [ +0.000388] kswapd+0x103/0x520
> [ +0.000494] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80
> [ +0.000547] ? balance_pgdat+0x5a0/0x5a0
> [ +0.000607] kthread+0x120/0x140
> [ +0.000508] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x60/0x60
> [ +0.000706] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
>
> Add a check in the add_memory path to ensure that the node to which we
> are adding memory is in the node_possible_map
>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> v2:
> - Centralize the check in the add_memory path (David)
> - Instead of failing, add the memory to a nearby node, while warning
> (and tainting) to call out attention to the firmware bug (Dan)
>
> v3:
> - Fix the CONFIG_NUMA=n case, and use node 0 as the final fallback (Dan)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 0a54ffac8c68..536a809d6ebb 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -980,6 +980,30 @@ static int check_hotplug_memory_range(u64 start, u64 size)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Check that the node provided for adding memory was valid.
> + * If not, find the nearest valid node and add the memory there while
> + * tainting the kernel and displaying a warning to bring attention to the
> + * underlying firmware problem.
> + * Return nid if valid, or an adjusted node number that can be used instead
> + * if the original nid was not valid
> + */
-ETOOMUCHDOCUMENTAION
"If the given node cannot be used (!node_possible()), return the nearest
possible node and WARN_TAINT() about firmware issues."
> +static int check_hotplug_node(int nid)
> +{
> + int alt_nid;
> +
> + if (node_possible(nid))
> + return nid;
> +
> + alt_nid = numa_map_to_online_node(nid);
> + if (alt_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> + alt_nid = first_online_node;
> + WARN_TAINT(1, TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND,
> + "node %d expected, but was absent from the node_possible_map, using %d instead\n",
> + nid, alt_nid);
> + return alt_nid;
> +}
> +
> static int online_memory_block(struct memory_block *mem, void *arg)
> {
> return device_online(&mem->dev);
> @@ -1005,6 +1029,10 @@ int __ref add_memory_resource(int nid, struct resource *res)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + nid = check_hotplug_node(nid);
> + if (nid < 0)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> mem_hotplug_begin();
>
> /*
>
You should do the same on the memory removal path.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
