On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:09:35 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I made this static. If we later wish to give it kernel-wide scope then > > "percpu_charge_mutex" will not be a good choice of name. > > Thank you. > And, yes..... memcg_cached_charge_mutex ? I don't see a need to rename the mutex unless we change it to have kernel-wide scope. Given that it's presently static to memcontrol.c, it's obviously part of memcg ;) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>