-----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:19:06PM -0400, Jim Paradis wrote:
>> [tried posting this a couple days ago... kept having formatting problems
>> with the exchange server. Let's see how this works...]
>
> Much more important is the problem that the patch is utterly useless
> as-is. It just adds adds exports, but no real functionality. It's not
> like I have told you exactly that a million times before, but given that
> you don't want to listen it might just be easier to ignore your patches.
Okay, then, help me out here. What would it take for this to be accepted?
Would you like us to incorporate the memory-harvesting code from LKSM as well?
--jim