Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm: Two small fixes for recent syzbot reports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:58 AM Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Agree to make a big deal part. My point is that when kicking trees of linux-next, it also could reduce the exposure of many patches (which could be bad) to linux-next and miss valuable early testing either from robots or human.

Sure. But I'd want to be notified when something gets kicked out, so
that I then know not to pull it.

So it would reduce the exposure of patches, but it would also make
sure those patches then don't make it upstream.

Untested patches is fine - as long as nobody else has to suffer through them.

               Linus




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux