Re: [PATCH 04/28] dma-mapping: use vmap insted of reimplementing it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 09:17:36PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > @@ -62,24 +42,20 @@ void *dma_common_pages_remap(struct page **pages, size_t size,
> >  void *dma_common_contiguous_remap(struct page *page, size_t size,
> >  			pgprot_t prot, const void *caller)
> >  {
> > -	int i;
> > +	int count = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> >  	struct page **pages;
> > -	struct vm_struct *area;
> > +	void *vaddr;
> > +	int i;
> >  
> > -	pages = kmalloc(sizeof(struct page *) << get_order(size), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	pages = kmalloc_array(count, sizeof(struct page *), GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> Is it making sense to vmalloc pages as long as array size is bigger than
> PAGE_SIZE?

Maybe, maybe not.  But it certainly doesn't fit this series.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux