On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:25 PM Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Seems like there is only one place where we can "sleep". I mean when we
> call vfree(). That is free_vmap_area_noflush() -> try_purge_vmap_area_lazy().
> Basically try_purge_vmap_area_lazy() can call the schedule() what is not
> allowed for IRQs. Instead of inlining the try_purge_vmap_area_lazy()
> into current context we can schedule_work(). And i think it makes sense
> from many point of views.
I don't think that's the only case.
Or rather, that may be the only case of _sleeping_, but we also aren't
irq-safe wrt locking.
And I'm not just talking about the vmap_purge_lock mutex, but all the
spinlocks etc we have.
That said, I haven't looked at that code in _ages_. Maybe those things
would be trivial to just turn into irq-safe ones and there are no real
latency issues anywhere.
Linus
