On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But we've not yet removed the old swp_entry_t i_direct[16] from > shmem_inode_info. That's because it was still being shared with the > inline symlink. Remove it now (saving 64 or 128 bytes from shmem inode > size), and use kmemdup() for short symlinks, say, those up to 128 bytes. > > I wonder why mpol_free_shared_policy() is done in shmem_destroy_inode() > rather than shmem_evict_inode(), where we usually do such freeing? I > guess it doesn't matter, and I'm not into NUMA mpol testing right now. > > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href