On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:22:28 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hierarchical reclaim doesn't swap out if memsw and resource limits are > same (memsw_is_minimum == true) because we would hit mem+swap limit > anyway (during hard limit reclaim). > If it comes to the solft limit we shouldn't consider memsw_is_minimum at > all because it doesn't make much sense. Either the soft limit is bellow > the hard limit and then we cannot hit mem+swap limit or the direct > reclaim takes a precedence. Thank you. I'd like to use your description. I'll post last week bug fixes series, today. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>